What would it not imply for Ukraine if it really begins producing Patriot missiles? : NPR

NPR’s Don Gonyea speaks with Seth Jones from the Heart for Strategic and Worldwide Research about President Trump granting Ukraine permission to provide Patriot missiles.

DON GONYEA, HOST:

One of the vital sought-after weapons on the earth is the Patriot air protection system developed by the U.S. It’s thought-about to be among the many only air protection programs, and it has been examined in wartime conditions by international locations from the Center East to Japanese Europe. In a uncommon transfer, President Trump introduced on the NATO summit this previous week that the U.S. will share the know-how with Ukraine. The issue is that the Patriot protection system is troublesome to provide. It takes a very long time to get manufacturing up to the mark, plus it is costly and requires quite a lot of technical know-how. So whereas Ukraine is raring to have such a weapon in its arsenal, what is going to it really take for the nation to ramp up manufacturing? Becoming a member of us now could be Seth Jones. He is the president of the Protection and Safety Division on the Heart for Strategic and Worldwide Research. Welcome.

SETH JONES: Thanks for having me on, Don.

GONYEA: Let’s begin with the Patriot missile system itself. What are its capabilities, and why is it so essential for international locations like Ukraine?

JONES: The Patriot is a system that has superior radar and most essential for Ukraine has interceptors on it that may goal incoming Russian ballistic and cruise missiles. It is not ultimate for drones, however it’s nice for incoming Russian missiles. The issue is there aren’t sufficient Patriots, and there aren’t sufficient Patriot interceptors proper now, so quite a bit is getting by means of Ukrainian defenses and hanging army and civilian infrastructure.

GONYEA: So what is the significance of Trump’s announcement that Ukraine might be granted a license to provide the missile interceptors?

JONES: Properly, there’s definitely a psychological increase to the U.S. president serving to the Ukrainians. It was not way back in February of 2025 the place the Oval Workplace assembly degenerated in entrance of the cameras. The opposite situation is that if and when the Ukrainians can really begin producing Patriots, it will likely be very useful for the protection of Ukrainian cities, army and civilian targets. The problem, after all, it’s prone to take a yr or extra relying on how rapidly the Ukrainians are capable of get among the key provide chain parts after which construct the programs.

GONYEA: OK. Properly, let’s speak about that manufacturing course of. What does it take to provide the varied parts of the Patriot missile system? It seems like a heavy raise.

JONES: It’s a heavy raise. What that is going to require is constructing the infrastructure for a lot of of those parts from strong rocket motors to seekers to the radar programs. After which you must get a variety of very advanced parts from throughout the globe. I believe what individuals do not absolutely perceive is the provision chain is dozens if not a whole bunch of firms.

GONYEA: So simply to be clear, does the license to construct Patriots really permit you to construct every part it’s worthwhile to even have a Patriot?

JONES: No. Getting the license to construct the Patriot will come right down to what parts, together with delicate parts of the Patriot, will the U.S. enable the Ukrainians to have and which components they won’t present the tech transfers for. There’s going to be a giant State Division dialogue about sensitivity of some parts that would get within the arms of the Russians and, after all, that the Russians get on the Chinese language.

GONYEA: The license is being granted to Ukraine. How uncommon is that in and of itself? What different international locations have gotten this similar form of licensing permission from the U.S.?

JONES: Properly, the licensing for a Patriot is comparatively uncommon. One of many few international locations that has gotten a full Patriot license is Japan. There’s additionally a older model of the Patriot that’s in-built Germany, however that’s not the Patriot and essentially the most up-to-date PAC-3.

GONYEA: Ukraine has Patriots that it will get from the U.S., however the brand new association, the licensing, would enable them down the highway to have produced their very own.

JONES: Sure, the U.S. has exported Patriot programs to Ukraine. What the license will do in a different way is enable the Ukrainians to construct them on their very own. It might be really, in some ways, a recreation changer for the Ukrainians, at the least on the air protection facet.

GONYEA: We have heard a couple of shrinking provide of Patriot missiles within the U.S. stockpile. How massive of a deal is that?

JONES: The shrinking provide of Patriot missiles is a large downside. The U.S. authorities retains these numbers categorised, however the work {that a} vary of our analysts have accomplished at CSIS has famous important makes use of of Patriot air protection programs and interceptors within the U.S. battle in opposition to Iran, Epic Fury. And when Iran shot a variety of its cruise and ballistic missiles, in addition to some drones, these Patriots have been completely important. The issue is that Iran shot so many missiles that the variety of U.S. interceptors was important and depleted the interceptors obtainable. And the timeline for producing them usually takes anyplace between two and three years. So it is not a short-term timeline for producing them on the manufacturing strains.

GONYEA: With the license and the power to provide Patriot missile defenses, are you able to speak about what that would imply when it comes to bringing in regards to the finish of the battle?

JONES: Having the Ukrainians capable of construct first tier air protection programs like a Patriot, even when it takes time to construct, I believe could be useful in displaying the Russians that the Ukrainians will seemingly be capable to combat for a protracted time frame. The Ukrainians are producing drones for offensive functions, some missiles for offensive functions. This can give them the power to provide air protection for ballistic and cruise missiles for the long run. I believe the lesson that the Russians would virtually definitely take out of that is that the Ukrainians will be capable to combat a protracted battle on offense and protection.

GONYEA: Seth Jones is the president of the Protection and Safety Division on the Heart for Strategic and Worldwide Research. Thanks, sir.

JONES: Thanks, Don.

Copyright © 2026 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.

Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts might fluctuate. Transcript textual content could also be revised to right errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its unique broadcast or publication. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.