Former US Ambassador to Russia on the Trump-Zelenskyy assembly : NPR

SCOTT DETROW, HOST:

President Trump met with Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the Vatican this morning. A photograph reveals the 2 leaders sitting head to head huddled collectively in seemingly deep dialog on the sidelines of Pope Francis’s funeral. The White Home says the 2 had, quote, “a really productive dialogue.” And on social media earlier as we speak, President Trump criticized his Russian counterpart, writing, quote, “there was no cause for Putin to be taking pictures missiles into civilian areas. It makes me assume that possibly he does not need to cease the struggle, he is simply tapping me alongside.” This all comes a day after U.S. Envoy Steve Witkoff met with President Putin in Moscow to debate a potential finish to the struggle in Ukraine. Right here to speak about what all of this high-level diplomacy means is Michael McFaul. He served as the previous U.S. ambassador to Russia in the course of the Obama administration and is at present the director of the Freeman Spogli Institute for Worldwide Research at Stanford College. Welcome.

MICHAEL MCFAUL: Thanks for having me.

DETROW: Let’s begin with this assembly. What do you make of the assembly? What do you make of the truth that afterward, Trump posted on social media criticizing Vladimir Putin, not Volodymyr Zelenskyy?

MCFAUL: Nicely, I am glad that they had the assembly. Anytime they will meet, particularly one on one, with out cameras, with out employees, that is at all times a great factor as a result of then President Zelenskyy will get to clarify his place on to President Trump. The response from President Zelenskyy on social media was very constructive, and different employees folks have mentioned constructive issues. And as you simply famous, President Trump additionally did criticize Putin. He instructed that possibly he isn’t critical about peace and that there needs to be sanctions. And that is, in my opinion, an accurate evaluation of the place Putin has been to this point, and that may be an accurate prescription to attempt to put strain on Russia – one thing President Trump and his crew have by no means executed. However I would additionally level out that President Trump sounds at all times powerful on social media and says numerous issues rhetorically and really not often follows up with concrete actions once we’re speaking about strain on Putin, strain on Russia.

DETROW: That is on the funeral of Pope Francis, who pushed for a number of years now for peace in Ukraine. Differently, Trump and the Trump administration have been pressuring Ukraine to chop a deal to finish the struggle. Trump mentioned yesterday he thinks Ukraine and Russia are shut. How do you learn that? What do you assume is going on within the coming weeks? Do you assume this struggle may finish?

MCFAUL: I am unsure. I fear that Putin shouldn’t be critical about ending this struggle. I feel Putin thinks time’s on his facet. Trump and his crew will ultimately get annoyed and stroll away. They’re going to reduce army help to Ukraine. And that is all in Putin’s favor for persevering with the struggle and to attempt to conquer the territory on the bottom that he’s already annexed on paper. You purchase a map in Russia as we speak and it has 4 of these areas of Ukraine as a part of the Russian Federation.

DETROW: Curious what your greatest lifelike learn is true now and never what you want to see however what you assume is lifelike. What you assume the most effective place Ukraine might be in in some type of peace deal might be at this second, given the manpower, given the dug-in entrance and given the truth that beneath President Trump, the U.S. could be very clear that it isn’t going to proceed supporting Ukraine in the best way that the U.S. did for a number of years of this struggle. Like, what do you assume the best-case state of affairs is right here for Ukraine?

MCFAUL: Nicely, I might disconnect two various things that get conflated. There is a ceasefire, after which there is a everlasting peace settlement to finish the struggle. And I feel these are two very various things. I feel most instantly, getting a ceasefire, and even when it needs to be a minimal one, getting a ceasefire that each side say we aren’t going to assault civilian targets, that may be an awesome achievement for the Ukrainians. Bear in mind, Putin always, daily and only a few days in the past, once more, of their capital of Kyiv, is attacking civilian targets. I name that terrorism. That might be nice to finish. After which that second, for those who acquired to a ceasefire, may create the permissive situations for an extended negotiation that I feel may go on for months, if not years, about some everlasting peace settlement. And I am not optimistic they’d ever get it, however no less than the struggle would cease with out forcing Zelenskyy to acknowledge annexation. And I feel, tragically, that is in all probability the most effective final result that Ukraine can hope for for as we speak with the long-term expectations that they’d purchase time for the Europeans to assist present the weapons that we’re not going to. And I say that tragically. I feel it is in America’s nationwide curiosity to proceed to assist deter Putin’s military from going additional, however clearly, President Trump, no less than to this point, disagrees with that.

DETROW: That is Michael McFaul, former U.S. ambassador to Russia, now with Stanford College. Thanks once more for speaking to us.

MCFAUL: Thanks for having me.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.

Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts could fluctuate. Transcript textual content could also be revised to right errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its authentic broadcast or publication. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.