The United Nations Wants a Secretary-Normal of Braveness, Not Comfort — World Points
GENEVA, March 30 (IPS) – The United Nations was not based to be snug; it was based to be essential. Created within the aftermath of disaster, its goal was clear: to keep up worldwide peace and safety, to uphold worldwide regulation, to defend human rights and to advertise human dignity and growth.
The workplace of the Secretary-Normal was by no means meant to be merely administrative. It was meant to be ethical, political and, when essential, brave.
As member states contemplate the appointment of the subsequent Secretary-Normal, they face a call that may form not solely the way forward for the United Nations, but in addition its credibility. The world right now doesn’t undergo from a surplus of establishments; it suffers from a scarcity of belief in them.
The subsequent Secretary-Normal should subsequently be greater than a cautious supervisor of forms. The world wants a pacesetter with imaginative and prescient, independence and integrity — a pacesetter keen to uphold the Constitution even when doing so is inconvenient to highly effective member states.
Too usually, the choice course of produces a candidate who is appropriate to everybody exactly as a result of they’re unlikely to noticeably problem anybody. This can be politically expedient, however it’s strategically short-sighted. An excessively cautious Secretary-Normal might protect short-term diplomatic consolation whereas presiding over long-term institutional decline.
The United Nations doesn’t want a determine who merely displays the steadiness of energy throughout the Safety Council; it wants a determine who displays the ideas of the Constitution.
The subsequent Secretary-Normal should be daring sufficient to articulate a transparent imaginative and prescient for what the United Nations is for within the twenty-first century. That imaginative and prescient should be rooted within the group’s founding goals: stopping battle, strengthening respect for worldwide regulation, defending human rights and selling circumstances beneath which peace is feasible. These targets require not solely administrative competence, however political braveness and ethical readability.
Equally vital, the subsequent Secretary-Normal should be robust sufficient to keep up independence from the affect of any single member state or group of states. The United Nations doesn’t exist to legitimize the actions of the highly effective; it exists to make sure that energy operates inside guidelines.
The Secretary-Normal can not fulfill this function if the workplace is perceived as working on the beck and name of some influential capitals. Independence just isn’t a luxurious on this function; it’s the supply of its authority.
With independence should come integrity. The United Nations possesses little in the way in which of conventional energy: it doesn’t command armies, it doesn’t management huge monetary sources and it can not compel states to behave. Its biggest asset is legitimacy — the assumption that it stands for one thing bigger than the pursuits of particular person nations.
That legitimacy relies upon closely on the non-public credibility of the Secretary-Normal. Moral management, transparency, accountability and consistency should as soon as once more develop into the defining traits of the workplace.
On this regard, the world would do properly to recollect Dag Hammarskjöld, who understood that the Secretary-Normal was not merely a secretary to governments, however a servant of the Constitution and, finally, of the peoples of the world. He demonstrated that quiet diplomacy and ethical braveness are usually not opposites; they’re companions.
He confirmed that the authority of the Secretary-Normal doesn’t come from army or financial energy, however from independence, integrity and a willingness to behave when motion is required.
A lot consideration is usually given to the identification of the subsequent Secretary-Normal — nationality, area, and more and more gender. These questions are politically comprehensible, however they don’t seem to be a very powerful questions. The defining query just isn’t the place the Secretary-Normal comes from, however what the Secretary-Normal stands for.
The United Nations is usually described as a corporation of states. However states exist to serve folks, not the opposite manner round. If that precept is true on the nationwide stage, it should even be true on the worldwide stage. The United Nations, subsequently, doesn’t finally belong to governments. It belongs to the peoples in whose title its Constitution was written. Member states don’t personal the United Nations; they’re trustees of it. And trustees are usually not meant to serve themselves, however these on whose behalf they maintain duty.
This understanding ought to information the choice of the subsequent Secretary-Normal. The place requires somebody who understands that the workplace just isn’t merely administrative, however custodial — custodial of the Constitution, of worldwide regulation and of the belief that the world’s peoples place, nonetheless imperfectly, within the United Nations.
The choice course of itself, nonetheless, raises a remaining and considerably uncomfortable query. The Secretary-Normal is usually described because the world’s prime diplomat, and but the world’s folks don’t have any direct voice in selecting this individual.
The choice rests, as everybody is aware of, with a small variety of states possessing veto energy. This can be politically practical, however it’s more and more troublesome to clarify to a world public that’s extra educated, extra related and extra conscious than at any time in historical past.
Maybe, then, sooner or later the world may experiment with one thing new — world consultations, and even worldwide elections — permitting the peoples of the world to specific their desire for who ought to occupy this uniquely world workplace.
It’s a barely amusing concept, even perhaps an unrealistic one for now, nevertheless it comprises a critical level: if the United Nations really begins with “We the Peoples,” then their voice ought to be heard extra clearly in selecting its chief.
Till that day comes, the duty rests with member states. They have to select not the most secure candidate, not essentially the most handy candidate and never the candidate least prone to upset highly effective governments. They have to select the candidate probably to uphold the Constitution, communicate with independence, act with braveness and restore integrity to the workplace.
The world doesn’t want a cautious supervisor.
The world wants a brave Secretary-Normal.
Naïma Abdellaoui, UNOG – UNison Employees Consultant, Worldwide Civil Servant since 2004.
IPS UN Bureau
© Inter Press Service (20260330175103) — All Rights Reserved. Unique supply: Inter Press Service
